Sunday, November 13, 2011

Affirmative Action: My take.

I support Affirmative Action. I feel that it is important for minority achievement and that the benefits outweigh the risks. Throughout my research I never really saw any strong statistics that showed the negative impact of Affirmative action. I feel that the government is wrong to try to end Affirmative Action. While prejudice, racism, and sexism still exists in this country why can't affirmative action? Affirmative action is not the only thing keeping us from a color blind society. Also, if kids are using things like money or contacts to get into college or to get a job, who's to say they can't use race?

As for whether or not I qualify for Affirmative action, the answer is no. There is no affirmative action consideration whatsoever for Pakistanis and none for Asians as well. However, I found these comments on http://www.asian-nation.org/.

Since affirmative action programs were first implemented, many Asian Americans have achieved remarkably high levels of education, economic, and occupational attainment. This socioeconomic success has led many colleges and companies to no longer consider Asian Americans as an "underrepresented" minority group and therefore, are no longer eligible to be included in such affirmative action guidelines and programs.

Unfortunately, in doing so, many colleges and companies demonstrate that they have not learned the fundamental lesson that not all Asian Americans are the same, and that not all are successful. Specifically, many Pacific Islanders and some Southeast Asian groups (i.e., Laotian, Cambodian, Hmong, etc.) are still struggling socioeconomically, are still "underrepresented" in such institutions, and therefore should still be included in such affirmative action programs.

The question still remains, do Asian Americans still benefit from affirmative action or are they being hurt by it? Again, it all depends on the specific program and set of guidelines in question and whether or not they include Asian Americans (or which specific APA groups) as an underrepresented group. For example, recent data has shown that after residents voted to end affirmative action programs in California, Florida, and Texas, enrollments of Asian Americans in the top public universities in these states increased while conversely, the numbers of Black, Latino, and even (ironically) White students have declined, along with a decline in the number of male students.

Data like this suggests that Asian Americans benefit the most when affirmative action programs are eliminated. On the other hand, other studies show that Asian American enrollments actually declined in law schools in California, Texas, and Washington after affirmative action was ended in these states and that the real reason for instances of increasing enrollments is not the elimination of affirmative action per se, but instead, is based on eliminating simple discrimination and judging Asian American applicants equally with other applicants

Effect of media on Government regulation of Affirmative Action

In all honesty, there is no way to tell this. Google doesn't have an answer and neither does any Affirmative Action interest websites. However, it is undoubtable that media play a huge part in government policy. The way things are portrayed to people on the TV or in an article will be one of the most crucial contributing factors in their decisions at the polls. It also has a huge impact on political campaigns and platforms. Interviews and show appearances are usually the most common way for candidates to reach out to voters.

Citizen websites/blogs/groups created to discuss Affirmative Action

Personal Blogs:

- tmariam.blogspot.com
- rantingaboutgovernment.blogspot.com
- layansalous.blogspot.com
- sanasandhu786.blogspot.com
- maryamsalus.blogspot.com
- amina-elbaz.blogspot.com
- amptoons.com/blog/category/affirmative-action/
- affirmact.blogspot.com
- affirmativeactionnews.blogspot.com/
- ofccp.blogspot.com/
 
Organizations:
 

Media Coverage on Affirmative Action

Citizen Groups on Affirmative Action

LULAC (League of United Latin American Citizens):
  • Stance: Supports it.
  • We have been slow in defining affirmative action and have failed to get the public response generated by the opposition. Affirmative action merely casts a wider net to include a larger number of qualified applicants to compete and participate. Affirmative action allows women and people of color and other minorities access to higher education, jobs, and business opportunities which have been historically out of their reach. Affirmative action is a system of goals and programs that strengthens our national economy. It provides Corporate America with the diversity necessary to compete in the global market. It helps to ensure that the public sector is reflective of the populations it serves. Quotas and preferential treatment have never been a part of any affirmative action program
ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union) :
  • Stance: Supports it.
  • Affirmative Action is one of the most effective tools for redressing the injustices caused by our nation’s historic discrimination against people of color and women, and for leveling what has long been an uneven playing field. A centuries-long legacy of racism and sexism has not been eradicated despite the gains made during the civil rights era. Avenues of opportunity for those previously excluded remain far too narrow. We need affirmative action now more than ever.
 NOW (National Organization of Women)
  • Stance: Supports it.
  • Affirmative Action levels the playing field so people of color and all women have the chance to compete in education and in business. White men hold 95% to 97% of the high-level corporate jobs. And that's with affirmative action programs in place. Imagine how low figures would be without affirmative action. Of 3000 federal court decisions in discrimination cases between 1990 and 1994, only 100 involved claims of reverse discrimination; only 6 of those claims were found to be valid...Despite the enormous gains made by the civil rights and women's rights movements, women and people of color still face unfair obstacles in business and education. An astonishing 70% of schools are not in compliance with Title IX, the federal equal education opportunity law. For every dollar earned by men, women on a whole earn 74 cents, African American women earn 63 cents and Latina women earn 57 cents. According to the Census Bureau, only 25% of all doctors and lawyers are women. Less than 1% of auto mechanics are women. And women are only 8.4% of engineers.

NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People)
  • Stance: Supports it.
  • The necessity of Affirmative Action has been a hot topic in American society for a number of years. Affirmative Action was established in 1965 by President Johnson in order to redress the discrimination that was evident in employment, education and business despite the civil rights laws which made such discrimination illegal. The purpose of Affirmative Action is to provide opportunities for minorities and women; it is not meant to create quotas.
CAIR (Council on American Muslim Relations)
  • Stance: Supports it.
  • The mistake of many critics of affirmative action is to understand it only as a guilt-driven form of reparations. By that thinking, white people are discriminated against today solely to make up for generations of bias against minorities. But greater diversity in any setting almost always benefits the nation as a whole. A diverse police force has tentacles in every corner of a community. A diverse classroom is likely to engage in a more robust and educational discussion of, say, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. A diverse Supreme Court can better appreciate the social impact of its decisions.

Sources:
http://www.aclu.org/FilesPDFs/affirmative_action99.pdf
http://lulac.org/advocacy/issues/speech/
http://www.cairchicago.org/tag/affirmative-action/
http://www.naacp.org/blog/entry/the-debate-on-affirmative-action
http://www.now.org/issues/affirm/talking.html
http://www.tmariam.blogspot.com/

Democrats and Republicans on Affirmative Action

Generally, democrats  tend to support it, while republicans tend to oppose it. However, not all democrats/republicans support their partys' views on the issue. Some democrats are against it while some republicans think it's a good idea. Many Americans support the idea of affirmative action but are against the way it is implemented. For example, some say that instead of looking at race as an indicator, income level, medical disadvantages etc. should be directly considered.

Obama's View:

Oklahoma State Representatives and Senators on Affirmative Action

Report Cards of House and Senate votes
House Of Representatives
Yeas:85
Armes              Fourkiller         McNiel             Roberts, D.       
Banz               Glenn              McPeak             Roberts, S.       
Bennett            Grau               Moore              Rousselot         
Billy              Hall               Morgan             Russ              
Blackwell          Hardin             Mulready           Sanders           
Brumbaugh          Hickman            Murphey            Schwartz          
Cannaday           Holland            Nelson             Sears             
Casey              Hoskin             Newell             Shannon           
Christian          Inman              Nollan             Stiles            
Cockroft           Jackson            Ortega             Sullivan          
Condit             Jordan             Osborn             Terrill           
Coody              Joyner             Ownbey             Thomsen           
Cooksey            Kern               Peters             Tibbs             
Cox                Key                Peterson           Trebilcock        
Dank               Kirby              Pittman            Vaughan           
Denney             Kouplen            Proctor            Watson            
Derby              Liebmann           Pruett             Wesselhoft        
DeWitt             Lockhart           Quinn              Wright            
Dorman             Martin, Sc.        Renegar            Mr.Speaker        
Enns               Martin, St.        Reynolds          
Farley             McCullough         Richardson        
Faught             McDaniel, R.       Ritze             

NAYS:7
Hamilton           Scott              Shumate            Williams          
McDaniel, J.       Shelton            Virgin            

EXCUSED:9
Brown              McAffrey           Sherrer           
Hilliard           Morrissette        Shoemake          
Johnson            Roan               Walker
Senate
YEAS:37
Aldridge          Burrage           Jolley            Shortey          
Allen             Crain             Justice           Simpson           Anderson          David             Marlatt           Sparks           
Ballenger         Ellis             Mazzei            Stanislawski     
Barrington        Fields            Myers             Sykes            
Bingman           Ford              Newberry          Treat            
Branan            Garrison          Nichols           Wyrick           
Brecheen          Halligan          Reynolds         
Brinkley          Holt              Russell          
Brown             Johnson, R.       Schulz            

NAYS:8
Bass              Eason Mc          Laster            Rice             
Coates            Johnson, C.       Lerblance         Wilson           

EXCUSED: 3
Adelson           Ivester           Paddack       


State Representative Sally Kern on Women and Blacks!   

Blacks


Women