Sunday, November 13, 2011

Minority Challenges

4.What other challenges do you feel exist for minority groups?   What do you propose should be done?

I feel that challenges exist mostly in education and employment for minorities. Unfortunately, prejudice is something that will always exist in the hearts of people, but things must be done to counteract the effects of prejudice. Women, for example, should make as much money as a man makes for the same labor. Education should be promoted throughout minorities. Things like Alcohol addictions, drug addictions, sanitation problems, adult and child obesity, diabetes, and teenage pregnancies that are more prevalent in minorities can be counteracted through education. And this is why I support affirmative action. I believe that the more educated the population gets, the better off the entire country will be.

Struggles and challenges faced by Minorities

3.Describe the struggles and challenges different minority groups have had to undergo in order to gain equal rights.

African Americans:

African Americans started out as slaves in the U.S. Eventually after the Civil War they gained their freedom, but then had to face segregation. They were not allowed to mix with whites and were often given less than equal facilites. Through peaceful protest by leaders such as Martin Luther King Jr. and Rosa Parks, African Amercians were able to win equal rights. Though they have come a long way, there is still some prejudice against them.

Women:

Women, at the time when America was founded, were seen as physically and intellectually inferior to men. They were expected to stay home and take care of the children. Eventually, women began establishing themselves as equals through major events throughout history. They include The Seneca Falls Convention, increased women employment during the world wars, and the Suffrage Movement. Though they have also come a long way, they are still not equal to men especially when it comes to income gaps.

Evolution of Rights, Responsibilities, and Benefits

2. How have these evolved over time? For instance, what rights do we have now that was non-existent previously?

Since the constitution and constitutional amendments were put into place when the U.S. was founded, citizens have had all the right they have now.However, many of the rights we practice under may not have been existent in the past. This is because of constitutional interpretation. As the country grows and diversifies, many aspects of its constitution are challenged and broadened in court. Citizens today view freedom of speech in a totally different light than citizens 75 years ago, for example. As the country grows and advances we will continue to explore the rights given to us by our founding fathers.

Rights, Responsibilities, and benefits of citizenship in the U.S.

1.  In your opinion, what are rights, responsibilities, and benefits of citizenship in the U.S other than voting, jury duty, obedience to lawful authority, and private ownership of property?

Rights:
Citizens in the united states have many rights given to them in the constitution and constitutional amendments. They include:

  • Freedom of speech
  • Travel with a U.S. passport
  • Run for federal office
  • Become eligible for federal grants and scholarship
  • Freedom of religion
  • Right to National Security
  • Eligible to work in all areas
  • Protection of federal, state and local laws
  • Personal privacy

Responsibilities:
As a citizen you are legally and morally obliged to serve your country as best you can. Here are some examples:

  • Support and defend the Constitution
  • Serve the country when required
  • Participate in the democratic process
  • Respect the rights, beliefs, and opinions of others
  • Participate in the local community
Benefits:
As a citizen of The United States there are many perks and benefits. They include:

  • U.S. citizens are able to sponsor immediate relatives (spouses, unmarried minor children and parents) for Legal Permanent Resident (LPR) status without a long wait for a visa to become available. The may also sponsor these other relatives, subject to visa availability
  • Possession of a United States passport.
  • Ability to travel, and even live, abroad without fear of jeopardizing citizen status.
  • Citizens may not be removed, or deported, from the United States. They are also able to re-enter the United States easily without being required to establish admissibility each time.
  • Ability to vote and fully participate in the U.S. electoral process.
  • Only U.S. citizens are able to hold elected public office.
  • Eligibility for many government-related jobs is restricted to citizens only.
  • Eligibility for public benefits from which non-citizens may be excluded.
  • Entitlement to substantial deductions on U.S. estate tax. 
  • Citizens are always eligible for Social Security and Medicare benefits, which many non-citizens may not be.
  • Protection under the law and constitution 

Letter to the editor

Dear Mr. Editor:
I am writing on behalf of the Islamic Society of Norman, a unique, tight-knit community of Muslims with diverse backgrounds from all over the world. As you may know, we have recently begun rebuilding our mosque, which is located on Lindsey Street. We began construction in January of this year and have continued through the fall and summer. It is a big step for us, as the previous mosque, which had been standing for over seventeen years, was inadequate to serve our community’s needs. The project, which began early this year, is estimated to be finished by the beginning of 2012.
Our mosque, known as Masjid An-Nur, was the first founded in the state of Oklahoma and was originally made of two remodeled homes from the 1950s. The first house was purchased in 1976 when Masjid An-Nur was first founded. The mosque not only caters to the Muslim students at the University of Oklahoma but the Muslim community of Norman as a whole. We are the only existing mosque in the city of Norman.
I would like to recognize the Norman community in their support of our mosque. The positive feedback we have been getting is simply overwhelming. So many people have approached me or written in to us after expressing their excitement about our mosque. We are extremely pleased, to say the least. As a member of the Norman community for my entire life, it was a wonderful thing to see my fellow citizens giving us such a positive response. Needless to say, we are very thankful of the community and its support. Hopefully, once the mosque has been completed, we will be able to open our doors to the public
Thanks,
Uzma Sandhu

Animal Shelter Issue in Norman

Residents in Norman OK in Cleveland county went to the polls Nov. 8th and approved a
five-year, $3 million general obligation bond issue to fund a new animal welfare shelter. Since voters approved the shelter, the cost will be added to their property taxes.The $3,035,000 will be paid back by increased property taxes over the next five years. A citizen survey in 2009 saw overwhelming support for renovation and expansion of the shelter. It is needed and will cost owners of $100,000-market-value properties less than $1 per month for the next five years
If you click here you can see the brochure made by the city of Norman for the project.
For:
  • The shelter is in disrepair and needs upgrading urgently
  • There are unsanitary conditions making it hard for the animals
  • Many animals have been euthanized due to lack of space and resources
Against:
  • Tax raises
Here is an example of a letter to the editor sent to the Norman Transcript:

NORMAN — Editor, The Transcript:


I would like to write about the upcoming vote on Norman’s new animal shelter. First off, I am all for it. I completely understand the additional burden this may place on property owners in Cleveland County. I also understand that a new animal shelter may not solve the root of the problem regarding housing needs for abandoned pets. 


I believe we have no other choice but to approve of the new facility. I also believe steps should be taken to try and help with determining qualified pet owners. I believe, first off, penalties should be harsher toward people who want to abuse and neglect their pets. In turn, hopefully, this will alleviate their desires to obtain one.


I read an article recently that stated that the new animal shelter and increase in tax dollars in The Norman Transcript would not solve the problem. I agree but also understand that raising taxes rarely ever solves any issue. I don’t believe it is even meant to entirely solve the issue but, more importantly, to address a need in the Norman community. Yes. Unfortunately, a new animal shelter is needed and I am all for providing pets a better facility while waiting for a second chance at life.


This is an excellent example of a letter to the editor. The writer saw something he didn't like and sent his argument with excellent support to the newspaper, and got it published.


Media and interest groups dedicated to this issue:


The Norman Transcript Articles-

 

Vote yes on Tuesday for new animal shelter


The Oklahoman articles-


Animal Shelter vote coming to Norman 


Facebook-


Urgent Action Needed for the Norman Animal Shelter


Other Letters to the editor/Opinion-

Only property owners have to pay toward new animal shelter

Say yes to new animal shelter

City needs new animal shelter

 

The shelter bond measure was passed on Nov. 8th with 75.85% of the vote! 

Total Votes:
For the proposition-yes   6982
Against the proposition-no  2223


The involvement of media, interest groups, citizens and politicians played a huge role in the
passage of the measure. There was only one negative article out of the many I found about the shelter. The Norman Transcript also published very emotional letters to the editor written by employees and long time volunteers of the shelter. This not only influenced the vote tremendously, but also showed the huge impact a letter to an editor can make as well as the beuty of free speech in this country. The facebook page was a huge success as well. It has 303 likes and over 100 people talking about it. As a citizen living in Norman, I saw a lot of signs and banners urging poeple to vote yes for the shelter posted by the new shelter NOW campaign. These no doubt influenced voters as well as generated voter interest. Lastly, the work of Council members Tom Kovach and Hal Ezzell on pushing the shelter bond measure through City Council  played a huge part in the measure.
  

Responsibilities and Issues falling under the scope of city and county Govt.

County:

County government exists to serve its citizens by providing services that they need. Here are some of the county government functions and examples of the services offered to fill these needs.

Protect the health and safety of it's citizens
  • Sheriffs dept., fire department, 911, snow removal, maintaining roads, keeping water clean, sewer systems, Sanitation dept., Food inspection, Animal Control.
Providing and maintaining public services through the collection of taxes.
  • Parks, libraries, public records of marriages, housing deeds, Board of Elections, Mid-Ohio Regional Planning Commission
Providing a system of justice.
  • Local courts, Public Defender, Prosecuting Attorney.
Protecting the rights of individuals
  • Zoning, Children Services, Human Services, Office of Aging, Child Support Enforcement, Veterans Service Commission.
Promoting the common welfare of the people.

  • Public parking, sponsoring day care facilities,  Economic development, job training and educational services, Mental Retardation and Development Disabilities, welfare, Entertainment (stadium etc.) , Convention centers, Veterans Memorial, County Fair, Human Services.
City:

A city government provides political direction and exercises control over the organization of a city. City governments make local laws and may supply emergency service

Function
  • city government's mission is to use financial and human resources to provide services and ensure civil order for residents.

Structure

  • City governments fulfill their duties through various structures. A mayor, city council, commission and city manager are common components.

Meetings

  • Municipal governments, by law, must meet regularly in public. Citizens may attend these meetings and offer opinions or raise concerns about proposals, local services and violations of ordinances. This feedback helps the local government body make decisions.

Services

  • Types of services provided by local governments include garbage disposal and utilities such as water and electricity. City governments maintain public areas, such as roads and parks, and may contract police and firefighting services as well.


 

Affirmative Action: My take.

I support Affirmative Action. I feel that it is important for minority achievement and that the benefits outweigh the risks. Throughout my research I never really saw any strong statistics that showed the negative impact of Affirmative action. I feel that the government is wrong to try to end Affirmative Action. While prejudice, racism, and sexism still exists in this country why can't affirmative action? Affirmative action is not the only thing keeping us from a color blind society. Also, if kids are using things like money or contacts to get into college or to get a job, who's to say they can't use race?

As for whether or not I qualify for Affirmative action, the answer is no. There is no affirmative action consideration whatsoever for Pakistanis and none for Asians as well. However, I found these comments on http://www.asian-nation.org/.

Since affirmative action programs were first implemented, many Asian Americans have achieved remarkably high levels of education, economic, and occupational attainment. This socioeconomic success has led many colleges and companies to no longer consider Asian Americans as an "underrepresented" minority group and therefore, are no longer eligible to be included in such affirmative action guidelines and programs.

Unfortunately, in doing so, many colleges and companies demonstrate that they have not learned the fundamental lesson that not all Asian Americans are the same, and that not all are successful. Specifically, many Pacific Islanders and some Southeast Asian groups (i.e., Laotian, Cambodian, Hmong, etc.) are still struggling socioeconomically, are still "underrepresented" in such institutions, and therefore should still be included in such affirmative action programs.

The question still remains, do Asian Americans still benefit from affirmative action or are they being hurt by it? Again, it all depends on the specific program and set of guidelines in question and whether or not they include Asian Americans (or which specific APA groups) as an underrepresented group. For example, recent data has shown that after residents voted to end affirmative action programs in California, Florida, and Texas, enrollments of Asian Americans in the top public universities in these states increased while conversely, the numbers of Black, Latino, and even (ironically) White students have declined, along with a decline in the number of male students.

Data like this suggests that Asian Americans benefit the most when affirmative action programs are eliminated. On the other hand, other studies show that Asian American enrollments actually declined in law schools in California, Texas, and Washington after affirmative action was ended in these states and that the real reason for instances of increasing enrollments is not the elimination of affirmative action per se, but instead, is based on eliminating simple discrimination and judging Asian American applicants equally with other applicants

Effect of media on Government regulation of Affirmative Action

In all honesty, there is no way to tell this. Google doesn't have an answer and neither does any Affirmative Action interest websites. However, it is undoubtable that media play a huge part in government policy. The way things are portrayed to people on the TV or in an article will be one of the most crucial contributing factors in their decisions at the polls. It also has a huge impact on political campaigns and platforms. Interviews and show appearances are usually the most common way for candidates to reach out to voters.

Citizen websites/blogs/groups created to discuss Affirmative Action

Personal Blogs:

- tmariam.blogspot.com
- rantingaboutgovernment.blogspot.com
- layansalous.blogspot.com
- sanasandhu786.blogspot.com
- maryamsalus.blogspot.com
- amina-elbaz.blogspot.com
- amptoons.com/blog/category/affirmative-action/
- affirmact.blogspot.com
- affirmativeactionnews.blogspot.com/
- ofccp.blogspot.com/
 
Organizations:
 

Media Coverage on Affirmative Action

Citizen Groups on Affirmative Action

LULAC (League of United Latin American Citizens):
  • Stance: Supports it.
  • We have been slow in defining affirmative action and have failed to get the public response generated by the opposition. Affirmative action merely casts a wider net to include a larger number of qualified applicants to compete and participate. Affirmative action allows women and people of color and other minorities access to higher education, jobs, and business opportunities which have been historically out of their reach. Affirmative action is a system of goals and programs that strengthens our national economy. It provides Corporate America with the diversity necessary to compete in the global market. It helps to ensure that the public sector is reflective of the populations it serves. Quotas and preferential treatment have never been a part of any affirmative action program
ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union) :
  • Stance: Supports it.
  • Affirmative Action is one of the most effective tools for redressing the injustices caused by our nation’s historic discrimination against people of color and women, and for leveling what has long been an uneven playing field. A centuries-long legacy of racism and sexism has not been eradicated despite the gains made during the civil rights era. Avenues of opportunity for those previously excluded remain far too narrow. We need affirmative action now more than ever.
 NOW (National Organization of Women)
  • Stance: Supports it.
  • Affirmative Action levels the playing field so people of color and all women have the chance to compete in education and in business. White men hold 95% to 97% of the high-level corporate jobs. And that's with affirmative action programs in place. Imagine how low figures would be without affirmative action. Of 3000 federal court decisions in discrimination cases between 1990 and 1994, only 100 involved claims of reverse discrimination; only 6 of those claims were found to be valid...Despite the enormous gains made by the civil rights and women's rights movements, women and people of color still face unfair obstacles in business and education. An astonishing 70% of schools are not in compliance with Title IX, the federal equal education opportunity law. For every dollar earned by men, women on a whole earn 74 cents, African American women earn 63 cents and Latina women earn 57 cents. According to the Census Bureau, only 25% of all doctors and lawyers are women. Less than 1% of auto mechanics are women. And women are only 8.4% of engineers.

NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People)
  • Stance: Supports it.
  • The necessity of Affirmative Action has been a hot topic in American society for a number of years. Affirmative Action was established in 1965 by President Johnson in order to redress the discrimination that was evident in employment, education and business despite the civil rights laws which made such discrimination illegal. The purpose of Affirmative Action is to provide opportunities for minorities and women; it is not meant to create quotas.
CAIR (Council on American Muslim Relations)
  • Stance: Supports it.
  • The mistake of many critics of affirmative action is to understand it only as a guilt-driven form of reparations. By that thinking, white people are discriminated against today solely to make up for generations of bias against minorities. But greater diversity in any setting almost always benefits the nation as a whole. A diverse police force has tentacles in every corner of a community. A diverse classroom is likely to engage in a more robust and educational discussion of, say, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. A diverse Supreme Court can better appreciate the social impact of its decisions.

Sources:
http://www.aclu.org/FilesPDFs/affirmative_action99.pdf
http://lulac.org/advocacy/issues/speech/
http://www.cairchicago.org/tag/affirmative-action/
http://www.naacp.org/blog/entry/the-debate-on-affirmative-action
http://www.now.org/issues/affirm/talking.html
http://www.tmariam.blogspot.com/

Democrats and Republicans on Affirmative Action

Generally, democrats  tend to support it, while republicans tend to oppose it. However, not all democrats/republicans support their partys' views on the issue. Some democrats are against it while some republicans think it's a good idea. Many Americans support the idea of affirmative action but are against the way it is implemented. For example, some say that instead of looking at race as an indicator, income level, medical disadvantages etc. should be directly considered.

Obama's View:

Oklahoma State Representatives and Senators on Affirmative Action

Report Cards of House and Senate votes
House Of Representatives
Yeas:85
Armes              Fourkiller         McNiel             Roberts, D.       
Banz               Glenn              McPeak             Roberts, S.       
Bennett            Grau               Moore              Rousselot         
Billy              Hall               Morgan             Russ              
Blackwell          Hardin             Mulready           Sanders           
Brumbaugh          Hickman            Murphey            Schwartz          
Cannaday           Holland            Nelson             Sears             
Casey              Hoskin             Newell             Shannon           
Christian          Inman              Nollan             Stiles            
Cockroft           Jackson            Ortega             Sullivan          
Condit             Jordan             Osborn             Terrill           
Coody              Joyner             Ownbey             Thomsen           
Cooksey            Kern               Peters             Tibbs             
Cox                Key                Peterson           Trebilcock        
Dank               Kirby              Pittman            Vaughan           
Denney             Kouplen            Proctor            Watson            
Derby              Liebmann           Pruett             Wesselhoft        
DeWitt             Lockhart           Quinn              Wright            
Dorman             Martin, Sc.        Renegar            Mr.Speaker        
Enns               Martin, St.        Reynolds          
Farley             McCullough         Richardson        
Faught             McDaniel, R.       Ritze             

NAYS:7
Hamilton           Scott              Shumate            Williams          
McDaniel, J.       Shelton            Virgin            

EXCUSED:9
Brown              McAffrey           Sherrer           
Hilliard           Morrissette        Shoemake          
Johnson            Roan               Walker
Senate
YEAS:37
Aldridge          Burrage           Jolley            Shortey          
Allen             Crain             Justice           Simpson           Anderson          David             Marlatt           Sparks           
Ballenger         Ellis             Mazzei            Stanislawski     
Barrington        Fields            Myers             Sykes            
Bingman           Ford              Newberry          Treat            
Branan            Garrison          Nichols           Wyrick           
Brecheen          Halligan          Reynolds         
Brinkley          Holt              Russell          
Brown             Johnson, R.       Schulz            

NAYS:8
Bass              Eason Mc          Laster            Rice             
Coates            Johnson, C.       Lerblance         Wilson           

EXCUSED: 3
Adelson           Ivester           Paddack       


State Representative Sally Kern on Women and Blacks!   

Blacks


Women

Conflicting Views of Affirmative Action

In general, when the details of specific affirmative action programs are raised, public reservations increase. Further, when people are questioned about programs involving preferential treatment for minorities, opinion turns negative. On all questions about affirmative action there are predictable racial differences in opinion, but significant gender differences are evident as well, even when the issue of gender inequality is not mentioned in the question.

Relatively few people ­ white or black ­ report having real life experiences with affirmative action: only 16% overall have been helped or hurt. Among those who’ve been affected, whites generally say they were hurt while blacks say they have been helped.

Impact of Affirmative Action

Only a small fraction of the public (16%) reports having been directly affected by affirmative action programs. Overall, 11% say they’ve been hurt, 4% have been helped. Among blacks, 14% say they have been helped by such programs, while 5% say they’ve been hurt. Among other non-whites, about equal numbers have been helped (11%) and hurt (13%).

Most Hispanics say they’ve been unaffected , but 4% say affirmative action has helped them and 8% say it’s hurt them. By a margin of 13% to 2%, whites say they’ve been hurt rather than helped ­ and more white men (17%) than women (9%) say this. As many white liberals as conservatives say they’ve been hurt.
A significant number of people ­ though much less than a majority ­ perceive that affirmative action programs stigmatize minorities. Overall, 27% of Americans ­ including 26% of whites and 37% of blacks ­ say that most people attribute minorities’ successes in business and education to racial preferences, rather than their own skills and abilities.


Source: Pew Research Center

Who does and doesn't benefit from Affirmative Action?

After searching Google with about 20 different variations of "who benefits from Affirmative Action in Oklahoma" I was unable to find any direct statistics of the people who do and do not benefit from Affirmative Action. However, here are some national statistics.

Women:

A government study showed that women made greater gains in employment at companies doing business with the federal government, and therefore subject to federal affirmative action requirements, than at other companies.
  •  Female employment rose 15.2% at federal contractors, and only 2.2% elsewhere.
  • The same study showed that federal contractors employed women at higher levels and in better paying jobs than other firms.
Many individual companies that have adopted affirmative action plans have demonstrated the impact on women.
  • After IBM set up its affirmative action program, its number of female officials and managers more than tripled in less than ten years.
  •  Corporate commitment to women and minorities enabled Corning to double its number of female and black employees and increase the proportion of women managers to 29%.
  •  Motorola has been rewarded with an increased representation of women and people of color in upper-level management. The company had two women and six persons of color as vice president in 1989, but boasts 33 female and 40 minority vice presidents today.
  •  In 1978, the Labor Department's Office of Federal Contract Compliance (OFCCP) reviewed the employment practices of the five largest banks in Cleveland. Three years later, the percentage of women officials and managers at these institutions had risen more than 20%.
  • When OFCCP first looked at the coal mining industry in 1973, there were no women coal miners. By 1980, 8.7% were women.
  • Litigation against police and fire departments has resulted in affirmative action plans that have produced dramatic increases in the employment of women (and minorities) in these fields as well. In 1983, for example, women made up 9.4% of the nation's police, and 1% of firefighters. Sixteen years later, women are 16.9% of police, and 2.8% of firefighters.
Women-owned businesses, which have also benefited from affirmative action requirements, have increased since 1987 by 103%.
  • Today, there are nearly 9.1 million woman-owned businesses, employing over 27.5 million people. 
Blacks:

Progress of African Americans: 1959-1993
Poverty   Unempl.   Median   Percent of
Year   Rate      Rate      Income   white median
--------------------------------------------------
1959    55.1%      NA     $5,998      44.6%
1960     NA      10.2%     6,200      47.0
1961     NA        NA      6,525      48.6
1962     NA        NA      6,814      49.4
1963     NA        NA      7,423      53.7
1964     NA        NA      7,929      56.2
1965     NA        NA      8,155      55.4
1966    41.8      7.3      8,837      60.0
1967    39.3      7.4      9,443      62.9
1968    34.7      6.7      9,918      63.2
1969    32.2      6.4     10,430      65.8
1970    33.5      8.2     10,858      69.1
1971    32.5      9.9     10,632      67.4
1972    33.3     10.0     11,399      69.3
1973    31.4      8.9     11,555      70.1
1974    30.3      9.9     10,797      68.1
1975    31.3     14.8     10,693      68.9
1976    31.1     13.1     10,983      70.3
1977    31.3     13.1     11,059      70.2
1978    30.6     11.9     10,908      70.3
1979    31.0     11.3     10,783      71.8
1980    32.5     14.3     10,520      71.0
1981    34.2     14.2     10,367      70.7
1982    35.6     18.9     10,372      70.0
1983    35.7     19.5     10,283      68.2
1984    33.8     15.9     10,529      68.3
1985    31.3     15.1     10,882      69.3
1986    31.1     14.5     11,020      68.0
1987    32.4     13.0     11,425      69.5
1988    31.3     11.7     11,859      69.7
1989    30.7     11.4     12,052      69.7
1990    31.9     11.3     11,711      68.7
1991    32.7     12.4     11,471      68.8
1992    33.4     14.1     11,252      68.5
1993    33.1     12.9     11,614      70.7
(huppie.com)
During this period of about 40 years, African American living at or below the poverty line decreased from 55.1% to 33.1%.  In addition, median income more the doubled. Many of these increases are related to Affirmative Action in both education and the work force.
White Males:


Because affirmative action gives preference to women and minorities, it may harm white males' chances at success. This group makes up about 35% of the American population.(census.gov) Affirmative Action may harm them in a number of ways.
  • White males may be laid off at work so the employer may fulfill the mandatory white-to-colored employee ratio
  •  not accepted to a university due to preference towards other groups
  •  not be given a job for the same reason.